Trump responds to Obama’s viral interview, saying he will ask Pentagon to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials – as it happened

theguardian.com·Robert Mackey·2026-02-20
View original article
0out of 100
Noticeable — persuasion techniques worth noting

This article uses strong emotional language and highlights divisions, portraying Donald Trump's administration negatively to make readers distrust him and feel outraged. It leaves out important details and context that would offer a more complete picture, such as normal bureaucratic processes or counter-arguments to economic claims.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus5/10Authority4/10Tribe6/10Emotion7/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

novelty spike
"Donald Trump, who is definitely not mad that his more popular predecessor Barack Obama got a lot of attention for saying last weekend that aliens “are real, but I haven’t seen them”, announced that he is directing the defense department and other agencies to release whatever files they have on the search for alien life."

This highlights a new and unusual announcement from a former President regarding a topic of perennial public fascination (UFOs/aliens), presented with a subtle jab at his ego to make it more attention-grabbing.

novelty spike
"Husband of Trump’s labor secretary accused of sexually assaulting two of her staffers - report"

This is presented as breaking news, an unexpected and scandalous event involving a high-profile political figure's close associate, designed to immediately capture reader interest.

attention capture
"FBI Director Kash Patel has jetted off to Italy to watch the men’s ice hockey medal matches, sticking taxpayers with a bill as high as $75,000, according to multiple reports."

The specific, large dollar amount and the contrast between official duty and personal leisure are presented to grab attention due to its scandalous nature.

Authority signals

institutional authority
"Sky Roberts, the brother of the late Virginia Giuffre, told CNN that Trump “is potentially implicated” by the Epstein files, “and he may have to answer some questions”."

The use of 'CNN' as the platform for the statement lends a perceived institutional weight to Roberts's claim, even though he is not an expert on legal matters.

institutional authority
"According to the Times, the allegations against Dr Shawn DeRemer, which led to the filing of a police report, are that he touched women inappropriately at the department’s main building..."

Leveraging the reputation of 'The New York Times' and the mention of a 'police report' gives credibility and weight to the accusations, framing them as serious and formally recognized.

expert appeal
"Bill Kristol, a prominent conservative commentator and founder of The Weekly Standard, said on X, “Shameful—but in a way useful. No one should any longer pretend we have a “Department of Justice.” We have a Department of Trump.”"

Kristol's established role as a 'prominent conservative commentator' provides an 'expert' or 'insider' perspective, making his harsh critique of the DoJ banner more persuasive and authoritative to certain readers.

Tribe signals

us vs them
"Donald Trump, who is definitely not mad that his more popular predecessor Barack Obama got a lot of attention for saying last weekend that aliens “are real, but I haven’t seen them”..."

This establishes a subtle 'us vs. them' dynamic, positioning Trump as reactive and possibly envious of Obama's popularity, implicitly aligning readers with one figure over the other based on pre-existing political sympathies.

us vs them
"The English far-right activist Tommy Robinson, who was repeatedly denied entry to the US in the past, spent Thursday in Washington DC, meeting people close to Trump according to images and video posted on his social media accounts."

Labelling Robinson as 'far-right' and detailing his past denials of entry immediately creates an 'us vs. them' dynamic, associating his controversial identity with Trump's inner circle and potentially alienating readers who oppose 'far-right' movements.

identity weaponization
"Haley’s courageous fight is proof that this isn’t about politics, it’s about exposing America’s two-tiered system of justice and bringing accountability to the Epstein class involved in the horrific abuse of young girls,” Khanna said in a statement. “She and her fellow survivors’ bravery was the catalyst for changing a rotten system and finally standing up for humanity and American values.”"

This frames the fight for justice in the Epstein case as a struggle for 'humanity and American values' against a corrupt 'Epstein class,' turning the issue into an identity marker of who stands for good vs. evil, encouraging readers to align with the 'good' tribe.

us vs them
"“She stands in stark contrast to Donald Trump, who will lie, deflect and blame everyone but himself for his failed presidency on Tuesday evening,” Jeffries said in a statement announcing her selection. “As our nation marks its 250th anniversary this summer, Governor Spanberger embodies the best of America as a mother, community leader and dedicated public servant.”"

This quote creates a clear 'us vs. them' partisan dynamic by sharply criticizing Trump's perceived character defects and contrasting them with Spanberger's virtues, implicitly inviting readers to align with Spanberger/Democrats as embodying 'the best of America'.

Emotion signals

outrage manufacturing
"FBI Director Kash Patel has jetted off to Italy to watch the men’s ice hockey medal matches, sticking taxpayers with a bill as high as $75,000, according to multiple reports."

This phrase is designed to evoke outrage and anger among taxpayers, implying a misuse of public funds for personal leisure.

outrage manufacturing
"The husband of Trump’s labor secretary, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, has reportedly been barred from the labor department’s headquarters in Washington DC after at least two female staff members accused him of sexually assaulting them, the New York Times reports."

The accusation of sexual assault, especially in a professional setting and involving a high-ranking official's spouse, is inherently designed to trigger strong emotional reactions, particularly outrage and disgust.

moral superiority
"“Haley’s courageous fight is proof that this isn’t about politics, it’s about exposing America’s two-tiered system of justice and bringing accountability to the Epstein class involved in the horrific abuse of young girls,” Khanna said in a statement. “She and her fellow survivors’ bravery was the catalyst for changing a rotten system and finally standing up for humanity and American values.”"

This statement frames the issue in stark moral terms, appealing to readers' sense of justice and positioning those involved in exposing the system as morally superior, fighting for 'humanity and American values' against a 'rotten system'.

outrage manufacturing
"“Americans don’t need another speech from Donald Trump pretending everything is fine when their bills are too high, paychecks are too low, and masked and militarized federal agents are roaming our communities violating Constitutional rights on a daily basis,” Padilla said in a statement."

This quote uses emotionally charged language ('bills are too high,' 'paychecks are too low,' 'masked and militarized federal agents,' 'violating Constitutional rights') to evoke frustration, fear, and outrage against the Trump administration's perceived failures and overreach.

outrage manufacturing
"“This is the cruelest and most arrogant group of people who have ever ascended to high office in the United States,” Ossoff went on to say about the Trump administration."

Ossoff's strong condemnation of the Trump administration as 'cruelest and most arrogant' is an explicit attempt to generate negative emotional responses, such as outrage and indignation, from the reader against the targeted group.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill the belief that Donald Trump's administration is characterized by scandal, impropriety, and an erosion of democratic norms and institutions. It intends to create a perception of Trump and his affiliates as untrustworthy, self-serving, and potentially corrupt.

Context being shifted

The article consistently shifts context to highlight negative aspects related to Trump. For instance, the discussion of UFOs shifts from Obama's casual comment to Trump's directive, subtly implying Trump's action is either a diversion or a response motivated by pique. The context of individuals meeting with Trump (e.g., Tommy Robinson) is shifted to emphasize their controversial pasts, implying a guilt-by-association without necessarily detailing the nature or purpose of the meetings beyond social media posts. The context around the FBI Director's travel shifts to emphasize personal use and cost over official duties, even when an FBI spokesperson offers an alternative explanation. The context of Trump's claims of 'affordability' is shifted to imply he is out of touch with reality and dismissive of genuine economic concerns.

What it omits

The article omits the broader political and functional context for many of the events. For instance, the usual protocols or justifications for high-level officials' travel are not fully explored when condemning the FBI Director's trip. The specific policy objectives or legal mandates behind Trump's directive on UFO files are largely absent, focusing instead on his potential motivation related to Obama. The article highlights criticisms of Trump's claims regarding affordability without providing a counter-assessment of economic indicators during his proposed timeframe to show its material impact. When discussing appointments to commissions, it omits the typical political nature of such appointments in any administration, making Trump's actions appear uniquely problematic.

Desired behavior

The reader is nudged toward skepticism, distrust, and disapproval of Donald Trump and his administration. They are encouraged to view Trump's actions and statements critically and perhaps to feel a sense of moral outrage or concern over the perceived decline of institutional integrity. It also implicitly grants permission to dismiss or devalue Trump's statements and actions as disingenuous or problematic.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
-
Rationalizing
-
Projecting

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

"Sky Roberts, the brother of the late Virginia Giuffre, told CNN that she would feel vindicated by his arrest on Thursday. Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested and held for hours by British police on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations he shared confidential material while he was UK trade envoy with the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied any wrongdoing or accusations against him. Roberts went on to say that 'it’s a shame' that Donald Trump won’t acknowledge the suffering of the survivors of Epstein’s abuse. 'It’s a shame that he continues to deflect. We would expect more from. the president of the United States,' Roberts said. 'Our president can’t do that right now. And the reason is, is because he is potentially implicated in these files and he has to come to terms with that, and he may have to answer some questions himself,' Roberts added."

!
Identity weaponization

"If an opinion has to be silenced for another idea to flourish, you are in a psyop."

Techniques Found(20)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Donald Trump, who is definitely not mad that his more popular predecessor Barack Obama got a lot of attention for saying last weekend that aliens “are real, but I haven’t seen them”, announced that he is directing the defense department and other agencies to release whatever files they have on the search for alien life."

The phrase "definitely not mad that his more popular predecessor Barack Obama got a lot of attention" uses emotionally charged and sarcastic language to implicitly criticize Trump's reaction and imply pettiness, rather than simply stating his actions.

Name Calling/LabelingAttack on Reputation
"The English far-right activist Tommy Robinson, who was repeatedly denied entry to the US in the past, spent Thursday in Washington DC, meeting people close to Trump according to images and video posted on his social media accounts."

Labeling Tommy Robinson as a "far-right activist" immediately places him within a politically charged, often negatively perceived category, which can influence reader perception of his association with Trump.

Name Calling/LabelingAttack on Reputation
"Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, organized of the mass, far-right “Unite the Kingdom” rally in London last year."

Again, the repetition of "far-right" in conjunction with his real name reinforces a negative political label, aiming to discredit him and, by extension, those he meets.

Guilt by AssociationAttack on Reputation
"The English far-right activist Tommy Robinson, who was repeatedly denied entry to the United States in the past, and was jailed by British authorities in 2013 for using a passport in someone else’s name to travel to the United States from Britain, spent Thursday in Washington DC, meeting with a series of people close to Donald Trump, according to images and video posted on his social media accounts."

This quote connects Trump and individuals close to him with a figure described with negative labels and a criminal past ('far-right activist,' 'jailed by British authorities for using a passport in someone else’s name'), implying that Trump or his associates share undesirable characteristics or are tainted by this association.

Obfuscation/VaguenessManipulative Wording
"Sky Roberts, the brother of the late Virginia Giuffre, told CNN that Trump “is potentially implicated” by the Epstein files, “and he may have to answer some questions”."

The phrases "potentially implicated" and "may have to answer some questions" are vague and do not provide concrete evidence or details, leaving the reader to infer negative conclusions without specific claims.

DoubtAttack on Reputation
"“Our president can’t do that right now. And the reason is, is because he is potentially implicated in these files and he has to come to terms with that, and he may have to answer some questions himself,” Roberts added."

By stating Trump "is potentially implicated" and "may have to answer some questions," Roberts casts doubt on Trump's character and involvement in the Epstein case without offering definitive proof, thereby undermining his credibility.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"FBI Director Kash Patel has jetted off to Italy to watch the men’s ice hockey medal matches, sticking taxpayers with a bill as high as $75,000, according to multiple reports."

The phrase "sticking taxpayers with a bill as high as $75,000" exaggerates the financial burden by highlighting the maximum reported cost without further context or breakdown, aiming to evoke public indignation.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Patel has repeatedly faced criticism for his use of the FBI’s Gulfstream passenger jet, which he has flown on to see his country musician girlfriend perform, to attend sporting events and to hunt a private ranch in Texas."

The description implies an abuse of power and privilege by listing seemingly trivial personal uses ('see his country musician girlfriend perform,' 'attend sporting events,' 'hunt a private ranch') of a publicly funded asset, creating a negative impression.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Spanberger, a former undercover CIA officer who served three terms in Congress, became Virginia’s first female governor earlier this year, resoundingly winning an office previously held by a Republican. She won the race by a double-digit margin, campaigning on affordability and lowering costs for families."

The use of positive, authoritative language like "undercover CIA officer," "resoundingly winning," and "double-digit margin" is chosen to elevate Spanberger's image and accomplishments, making her seem more credible and effective.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"“She stands in stark contrast to Donald Trump, who will lie, deflect and blame everyone but himself for his failed presidency on Tuesday evening,” Jeffries said in a statement announcing her selection."

The words "lie, deflect and blame everyone but himself for his failed presidency" are highly pejorative and aim to severely damage Trump's reputation and character through emotionally charged criticism.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"“Haley’s courageous fight is proof that this isn’t about politics, it’s about exposing America’s two-tiered system of justice and bringing accountability to the Epstein class involved in the horrific abuse of young girls,” Khanna said in a statement."

Words and phrases like "courageous fight," "two-tiered system of justice," "horrific abuse of young girls," and "Epstein class" are designed to evoke strong emotional responses, painting a picture of systemic injustice and moral outrage.

Guilt by AssociationAttack on Reputation
"The husband of Donald Trump’s labor secretary, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, has reportedly been barred from the labor department’s headquarters in Washington DC after at least two female staff members accused him of sexually assaulting them, the New York Times reports."

This sentence links a negative allegation (sexual assault) directly to the husband of Trump's labor secretary. While not directly accusing Trump, it associates his administration with scandal and misconduct by proximity.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Trump also made no mention of the fact that, in 2022, when Mike Collins won the Republican nomination to represent Georgia’s 10th Congressional District in Congress, he trounced Vernon Jones, who had Trump’s endorsement, by 50 points."

The word "trounced" is an emotionally charged term that emphasizes a decisive defeat, making Trump's endorsement appear weak or ineffective.

DoubtAttack on Reputation
"So far, the most eye-catching claim has been Trump’s statement, unsupported by anything like evidence, that he has triumphed over “affordability”."

The phrase "unsupported by anything like evidence" directly questions the veracity of Trump's claim, aiming to instill doubt in the reader about his statements without concrete refutation.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"“Shameful—but in a way useful. No one should any longer pretend we have a “Department of Justice.” We have a Department of Trump.”"

The words "Shameful" and the sarcastic re-labeling to "Department of Trump" are emotionally charged and designed to provoke outrage and cynicism about the independence of the Department of Justice under Trump's administration.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"“I think it’s a shame. I think it’s very sad,” Trump said. “I think it’s so bad for the royal family … To me, it’s a very sad thing.”"

The repeated use of "shame" and "sad" by Trump is an appeal to emotion, attempting to evoke sympathy or concern without engaging in a logical discussion of the underlying issues.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"“When you look at that compared to the cost of war, that’s two weeks of fighting, it’s a very small number. It sounds like a lot, but it’s a very small number,” Trump said."

Trump minimizes the sum of $10bn by comparing it vaguely to "two weeks of fighting," making a large expenditure seem insignificant without providing a clear, verifiable cost comparison or justification.

Obfuscation/VaguenessManipulative Wording
"He offered no details about how the US would send this money to the board, or if he’s requested approval from Congress for the funds."

This sentence highlights the lack of specifics regarding the funding, drawing attention to undeveloped plans and creating an impression of unreliability or lack of transparency without directly claiming wrongdoing.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"The president fired the previous members of the board last year and installed several loyalists in January, which included his 26-year-old assistant."

The word "loyalists" carries a negative connotation, suggesting that the appointments were based on personal allegiance rather than merit, and potentially delegitimizes the appointees' qualifications.

Guilt by AssociationAttack on Reputation
"Authoritarians, strongmen and dictators: who is on Trump’s Board of Peace?"

This headline explicitly associates Trump's 'Board of Peace' with highly negative terms like "Authoritarians, strongmen and dictators," implying that his initiative is aligned with oppressive regimes and, by extension, casts Trump in a negative light.

Share this analysis