Costa Rica shutters its embassy in Cuba and orders diplomats to leave

cbsnews.com·Joe Walsh
View original article
0out of 100
Noticeable — persuasion techniques worth noting

This article tries to convince you that Cuba's government is oppressive and deserves to be isolated or even overthrown. It does this by painting a picture of Cuba as a failing communist state facing justified international pressure, while leaving out important details about the long history of US actions and their impact on the country. The article uses strong, emotional language and exaggerates some claims to push you towards supporting aggressive action against Cuba.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus4/10Authority3/10Tribe6/10Emotion4/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

novelty spike
"Costa Rica on Wednesday closed its embassy in Havana and told Cuba's communist government to pull its diplomats from San José."

The opening sentence immediately presents a significant, unexpected diplomatic event, grabbing attention as a breaking development.

unprecedented framing
""We have to clean out communists from the hemisphere," Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves declared after the diplomatic rupture."

President Chaves's strong, ideologically charged statement is presented as an unprecedented and attention-grabbing declaration following the diplomatic incident, suggesting a new level of confrontation.

attention capture
"Costa Rica's leadership is allied with President Trump, who has recently suggested he may "take" Cuba."

Connecting an international diplomatic incident to a high-profile, controversial figure like Trump and his provocative statements immediately elevates the story's perceived importance and novelty, drawing in readers interested in Trump's actions.

Authority signals

institutional authority
"Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves declared..."

The article uses the official title of the Costa Rican President to lend weight and legitimacy to his controversial statement, leveraging his position of power.

institutional authority
"Costa Rican Foreign Minister Arnoldo Andre Tinoco cited "deep concern" about the "sustained deterioration of the human rights situation on Cuba...""

The Foreign Minister's statements are presented as authoritative reasons for the diplomatic action, using his official capacity to justify the closure.

institutional authority
"Mr. Trump said Sunday that the Cuban and U.S. governments are talking..."

The article quotes former President Trump, leveraging his past and continued influence, even if his statements are sometimes vague or controversial, to provide an authoritative voice regarding US-Cuba relations.

Tribe signals

us vs them
""We have to clean out communists from the hemisphere," Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves declared after the diplomatic rupture."

This quote creates a clear 'us-vs-them' dynamic, explicitly drawing a line between 'we' (non-communists/Western allies) and 'them' (communists in the hemisphere), fostering an ideological tribal division.

us vs them
"Costa Rica's leadership is allied with President Trump..."

This statement frames Costa Rica's actions within a broader political 'tribe' aligned with former President Trump, implying a shared ideology or approach that distinguishes them from other nations or political perspectives.

us vs them
"In doing so, Costa Rica follows in the footsteps of another Trump ally, Ecuador, which on March 4 expelled Cuba's ambassador..."

This further solidifies the 'us-vs-them' dynamic by grouping nations (Costa Rica, Ecuador) under the 'Trump ally' banner, suggesting a coordinated front against Cuba and its government, thereby creating a clear tribal alignment.

identity weaponization
"The Cuban Embassy in the U.S. responded to the closure by alleging in a social media post that Costa Rica made the move "under pressure from the United States.""

This quote, while reported, weaponizes national identity and geopolitical alignment against Costa Rica, portraying its actions not as sovereign but as influenced by a powerful 'other' (US pressure), which can be seen as an 'us-vs-them' framing from Cuba's perspective within the article.

Emotion signals

outrage manufacturing
""We have to clean out communists from the hemisphere," Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves declared after the diplomatic rupture."

The highly charged and aggressive language used by President Chaves is designed to provoke strong emotional reactions, potentially outrage or alarm, depending on the reader's perspective, by framing a diplomatic action as an ideological 'clean-up'.

urgency
"President Trump, who has recently suggested he may "take" Cuba. ... "Whether I free it, take it, I think I could do anything I want with it.""

Trump's provocative statements, particularly the use of 'take' and 'do anything I want with it,' create a sense of alarming urgency and potential conflict, tapping into readers' apprehension about geopolitical instability and strong-arm tactics.

fear engineering
"Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez responded to Mr. Trump's statements by writing on social media late Tuesday that "any external aggressor will clash with an impregnable resistance.""

The Cuban President's response, threatening 'impregnable resistance' against an 'external aggressor,' is designed to evoke fear and apprehension of potential military escalation or conflict.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill a belief that Cuba's communist government is an illegitimate and oppressive regime, deserving of isolation and potentially even forceful intervention. It suggests that actions taken against Cuba, such as diplomatic rupture or even military 'taking,' are justifiable responses to its internal conditions and ideological alignment.

Context being shifted

The article shifts context by presenting the diplomatic actions of Costa Rica and Ecuador, and the statements from President Trump, as a coordinated and justified response to Cuba's internal affairs. This frames the actions as part of a larger, legitimate campaign against communism and human rights abuses, making the 'cleaning out' or 'taking' of Cuba seem like a natural next step.

What it omits

The article omits detailed historical context of US-Cuba relations, the economic impact of the long-standing US embargo on Cuba (which contributes to 'severe energy shortages' and 'power blackouts'), and the complex geopolitical motivations of the various actors beyond simple 'communism' and 'human rights.' It also doesn't elaborate on the 'interference' or 'violent activities' Ecuador accused Cuba's ambassador of, preventing the reader from independently assessing the legitimacy of those claims.

Desired behavior

The reader is nudged towards accepting and potentially supporting aggressive diplomatic isolation, and even military intervention, against Cuba. It encourages a stance of viewing Cuba as an antagonist that requires forceful resolution, rather than a nation with which diplomatic or peaceful resolutions might be sought. It also legitimizes a 'tough on communism' foreign policy approach.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
!
Rationalizing

"Costa Rican Foreign Minister Arnoldo Andre Tinoco cited 'deep concern' about the 'sustained deterioration of the human rights situation on Cuba, as well as the increase in acts of repression against citizens, activists and dissidents.' ... 'We have to clean out communists from the hemisphere,' Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves declared after the diplomatic rupture."

!
Projecting

"The Cuban Embassy in the U.S. responded to the closure by alleging in a social media post that Costa Rica made the move 'under pressure from the United States.'"

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

"Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves declared after the diplomatic rupture. 'We have to clean out communists from the hemisphere.' ... Costa Rican Foreign Minister Arnoldo Andre Tinoco cited 'deep concern' about the 'sustained deterioration of the human rights situation on Cuba, as well as the increase in acts of repression against citizens, activists and dissidents.'"

-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(3)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
""We have to clean out communists from the hemisphere,""

The word 'clean out' is emotionally charged and disproportionate, implying that 'communists' are a contaminant or infestation that needs to be purged, rather than a political ideology or group of people. This frames the action of removing diplomats and closing embassies as a moral imperative rather than a diplomatic maneuver.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Cuba's communist government has faced months of intense U.S. pressure and has languished under severe energy shortages."

The word 'languished' is emotionally charged and paints a picture of prolonged suffering and neglect, implying a state of weakness or decline, which can influence reader perception of the Cuban government's stability and effectiveness under U.S. pressure.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"Mr. Trump said Sunday that the Cuban and U.S. governments are talking, and 'I think we will pretty soon either make a deal or do whatever we have to do.' The president hasn't specified what his plans are for Cuba. 'We'll be doing something with Cuba very soon,' Mr. Trump told reporters Tuesday. And on Monday, Mr. Trump said, 'Whether I free it, take it, I think I could do anything I want with it.'"

Trump's statements about 'do whatever we have to do,' 'doing something with Cuba very soon,' and 'Whether I free it, take it, I think I could do anything I want with it' are vague but also highly exaggerated in their implication of unchecked power and potential for drastic, unilateral action against a sovereign nation, given the realities of international law and diplomacy. This language suggests a greater degree of control and imminent, dramatic intervention than is typically feasible or expressed in diplomatic discourse.

Share this analysis