Tech companies are making their robots cute to try to win over humans

nbcnews.com·By Angela Yang
View original article
0out of 100
Moderate — some persuasion patterns present

This article uses quotes from robot designers and company executives to suggest that "cute", pet-like robots are naturally friendly companions that we'll easily bond with, similar to pets. While it quotes experts to support this idea, it doesn't explore potential downsides like ethical concerns or why companies might choose to make robots seem cuddly beyond user comfort.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus3/10Authority6/10Tribe1/10Emotion4/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

novelty spike
"When the streets of Los Angeles flooded with rain last week, some of the city’s residents found themselves feeling sorry for a peculiar object: a food delivery robot floundering in water and debris."

The novelty of people feeling 'sorry for a peculiar object' like a robot is designed to immediately capture attention and make the reader curious about this unusual phenomenon.

unprecedented framing
"As AI-powered robots grow more common in households and public spaces, tech developers are racing to figure out how to make them appealing to humans."

This frames the current situation as a rapid, high-stakes 'race' to solve a new problem ('make them appealing to humans'), implying a significant and ongoing shift.

Authority signals

expert appeal
"Ellie Sanoubari, a robot designer and postdoctoral researcher focusing on human-robot interaction."

Leverages her specific credentials and area of expertise to lend credibility to her statements about robot design and human comfort.

expert appeal
"Ashu Rege, the vice president of autonomy for DoorDash."

Uses his corporate executive title and role at a major company to add weight to his opinions on robot design and human acceptance.

celebrity endorsement
"A California startup called Interaction Labs recruited Oscar-nominated “Toy Story” writer Alec Sokolow to help design its interactive lamp, called Ongo."

Uses the prestige of 'Oscar-nominated' and association with a beloved franchise ('Toy Story') to imbue the robot design discussion with cultural weight and perceived quality.

expert appeal
"Brian Comiskey, the Consumer Technology Association’s senior director of innovation and trends"

His title from a prominent industry association lends authority to his insights on market trends and robot development.

Tribe signals

manufactured consensus
"He said the company built Dot to be round because studies have shown that humans tend to prefer rounded elements over boxy, square ones."

While citing 'studies,' it implies a general consensus among humans regarding aesthetic preferences without detailing the studies, framing it as a universally accepted fact.

Emotion signals

moral superiority
"“She’s doing her best, you guys,” one social media user says in a video posted to Instagram showing a delivery robot struggling to drive onto a flooding curb. “Wait, I’m so sad. This is an empath’s worst nightmare.”"

The social media quote evokes a sense of empathy and sadness for the robot, implying that a good, compassionate person (an 'empath') would feel this way, subtly judging those who might not.

urgency
"As AI agents take on a physical presence in robots, Sanoubari warned that the same risks of emotional dependency people face with chatbots could translate to robots too. Robotic AI-powered toys and petlike companions have already raised a flurry of concerns around data privacy, loose guardrails and inappropriate conversation topics for kids."

This statement uses language like 'warned' and 'raised a flurry of concerns' to create a sense of potential impending issues and stakes, prompting a mild emotional response of caution or worry.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill the belief that AI-powered robots, particularly those designed with 'cute' and 'pet-like' features, are inherently friendly, harmless, and desirable companions. It wants the reader to believe that a deep-seated biological and emotional connection to these robots is natural and to be expected.

Context being shifted

The article shifts the context of AI-powered robots from being purely functional machines to entities that warrant human affection, empathy, and even 'acceptance' within a 'family' dynamic. This framing makes emotional responses to robots seem normal and even expected due to their design.

What it omits

The article largely omits detailed discussion of the potential downsides, ethical concerns (beyond a brief mention of data privacy and 'loose guardrails' for children), or the broader societal implications of fostering deeply emotional attachments to AI robots. It doesn't explore the commercial motivations behind 'cutesy' design that might override user well-being, nor does it question the implications of creating dependency on sophisticated AI systems.

Desired behavior

The reader is implicitly granted permission to feel affection, sympathy, and a sense of 'acceptance' towards these anthropomorphic robots, treating them similarly to pets or companions, and to embrace their integration into daily life as a natural and positive development.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

!
Socializing

"“She’s doing her best, you guys,” one social media user says in a video posted to Instagram showing a delivery robot struggling to drive onto a flooding curb. “Wait, I’m so sad. This is an empath’s worst nightmare.”"

-
Minimizing
!
Rationalizing

"“By designing them with these cute, softer features, and even especially having eyes, a face and gestures that are similar to humans,” Comiskey said, “it allows humans, where we’re wired to read body language and faces and movements, to immediately start to attach to them a lot more quickly.”"

-
Projecting

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

"“As humans, we are social animals. We have dogs, we have cats, we have all kinds of pets,” said Ashu Rege, the vice president of autonomy for DoorDash. “And Dot and robots like Dot want to be part of that family, so to speak. I think they absolutely have some kind of character or persona.”"

-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(5)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"“She’s doing her best, you guys,” one social media user says in a video posted to Instagram showing a delivery robot struggling to drive onto a flooding curb. “Wait, I’m so sad. This is an empath’s worst nightmare.”"

The phrases 'She’s doing her best, you guys,' 'I’m so sad,' and 'an empath’s worst nightmare' are emotionally charged and designed to elicit sympathy and affection towards the robot, subtly framing the interaction with the machine in highly humanized and emotional terms.

Appeal to ValuesJustification
"“As humans, we are social animals. We have dogs, we have cats, we have all kinds of pets,” said Ashu Rege, the vice president of autonomy for DoorDash. “And Dot and robots like Dot want to be part of that family, so to speak. I think they absolutely have some kind of character or persona.”"

This quote appeals to the shared human value of companionship and the idea of pets as part of a family. By framing robots 'wanting to be part of that family,' it taps into readers' emotional connections to their own pets and families to foster acceptance of robots.

Obfuscation/VaguenessManipulative Wording
"Robotic AI-powered toys and petlike companions have already raised a flurry of concerns around data privacy, loose guardrails and inappropriate conversation topics for kids."

The phrase 'flurry of concerns around data privacy, loose guardrails and inappropriate conversation topics for kids' is vague and lacks specific examples or details about these concerns. It implies problems without providing concrete evidence, which can create an impression of widespread issues without clear justification.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"“So humans are cute that way,” she said. “Humans develop their own attachment. They kind of assign meaning to things.”"

The statement 'So humans are cute that way' significantly minimizes the complexity of human emotional attachment and anthropomorphism, reducing it to a simple, almost childlike trait ('cute way') rather than a complex psychological phenomenon. This minimization serves to playfully dismiss potentially serious concerns about human-robot interaction.

Appeal to AuthorityJustification
"Brian Comiskey, the Consumer Technology Association’s senior director of innovation and trends, said many developers are trying to strike a balance between a robot’s responsiveness — its ability to quickly and reliably execute a task — and its physical cuteness."

The article cites Brian Comiskey, identified by his position as a 'senior director of innovation and trends' at the Consumer Technology Association, to support the claim about developers' design priorities. This uses his perceived expertise and institutional affiliation to lend weight to the statement.

Share this analysis