"LIVE UPDATES"

The 'LIVE UPDATES' framing, paired with 'Published' and 'Updated' timestamps typical of liveblogs, creates a sense of immediacy and the ongoing, extraordinary nature of the events, designed to capture and hold continuous attention.

"The US president is set to deliver a speech on the Middle East war later tonight... his first prime-time address since the conflict began, as plunging approval ratings and rising economic anxiety deepen political pressure at home."

Framing the speech as the president's 'first prime-time address' on the conflict, especially with the added context of political pressure, highlights its perceived significance and novelty, suggesting an extraordinary moment.

"Welcome to RT’s live coverage of the US-Israeli war on Iran and the wider turmoil across the Middle East, which continues to be affected by missile and drone strikes from both sides."

The direct address 'Welcome to RT’s live coverage' and the immediate plunge into a broad, ongoing conflict ('US-Israeli war on Iran and the wider turmoil... missile and drone strikes from both sides') is designed to immediately hook the reader into a significant, unfolding narrative.

"The IMF has warned that the Middle East war is impacting global economies through higher energy prices, disrupted supply chains and financial market volatility."

Citing the International Monetary Fund (IMF) leverages its institutional weight and perceived economic expertise to lend credibility to the claims about the war's global economic impact. This attributes persuasive power to the IMF's pronouncements.

"Political scientist Aaron Good has dismissed Trump’s threats to “obliterate” Iran’s infrastructure as “bluster and bravado,” arguing Washington lacks any viable military option. Speaking to RT, he warned such strikes could backfire, saying destroying Iran’s oil sector “would just drive up the price of oil,” while Tehran retains the capacity to retaliate across the region."

The 'political scientist' credential frames Aaron Good as an expert, and his specific claims about military options and economic consequences are presented with the inherent authority of an academic, intended to sway the reader's perception of the military situation.

"More than 115,000 civilian units have been damaged or destroyed in recent attacks on Iran, the Red Crescent has said."

Citing the Red Crescent, a globally recognized humanitarian organization, lends significant weight and credibility to the reported number of damaged or destroyed civilian units. This leverages the institution's perceived authority and neutrality.

"Welcome to RT’s live coverage of the US-Israeli war on Iran and the wider turmoil across the Middle East, which continues to be affected by missile and drone strikes from both sides."

Immediately establishes a clear 'us-vs-them' dynamic by framing the conflict as 'US-Israeli war on Iran,' setting up a powerful opposition between these state actors. While reporting a conflict, the framing itself can reinforce tribal divisions and simplify complex geopolitical realities.

"The war will continue until the aggressor is punished and full compensation is paid to Iran, he added."

This statement from the Iranian Foreign Minister, while reported, clearly articulates a tribal demand for justice and punishment against an 'aggressor,' reinforcing an 'us (Iran) vs. them (the aggressor)' dichotomy that appeals to a sense of wronged identity and retribution.

"Pezeshkian insists that Tehran “never initiated a war” in modern history and frames its military posture as “legitimate self-defense.” In the letter, Pezeshkian questions the rationale behind US military action, accusing Washington of fueling conflict and “manufacturing” threats, while warning that continued strikes risk long-term instability and damage to America’s global standing."

This section explicitly positions Iran as a victim acting in 'legitimate self-defense' against an aggressor (US/Washington) accused of 'fueling conflict' and 'manufacturing threats.' This creates a strong 'us (Iran) vs. them (US)' narrative, weaponizing national identity and patriotism.

"The IMF has warned that the Middle East war is impacting global economies through higher energy prices, disrupted supply chains and financial market volatility."

This statement is designed to evoke fear and anxiety about broad economic instability, directly connecting the conflict to potential personal financial hardship through 'higher energy prices,' 'disrupted supply chains,' and 'financial market volatility.' While reporting, the focus on these negative economic consequences functions to heighten emotional response.

"More than 115,000 civilian units have been damaged or destroyed in recent attacks on Iran, the Red Crescent has said. The sites reportedly include residential, medical, educational, and relief centers, with a significant share located in Tehran province."

The sheer number of '115,000 civilian units' alongside the description of damaged 'residential, medical, educational, and relief centers' is intended to generate outrage and sympathy for the affected population. While reporting on a humanitarian crisis, the specific enumeration and description maximize emotional impact.

"Help us stop terrorist attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and elsewhere. If you have information on Iranian-aligned terrorist militia groups or others responsible for these attacks, send us your tips today."

The call to 'Help us stop terrorist attacks' and 'send us your tips today' creates a sense of urgency and direct appeal to the reader's protective instincts, leveraging fear of terrorism to prompt an emotional response and potential action.