Article Summary

This article reports on a Federal Court decision criticizing the government's long-standing effort to deport Mohamed Harkat, a refugee accused of terrorist ties, saying the case relied on speculation and unfounded assumptions. It highlights judicial skepticism about the fairness and reasoning behind deportation proceedings based on secret intelligence, while presenting Harkat's side of the story, including his fear of torture if sent back to Algeria. The article uses official sources and court rulings to raise questions about due process but doesn't detail the evidence previously used to justify the security certificate.