Article Summary

This article reports that the U.S. used far more missile interceptors than Israel during the conflict with Iran, suggesting America bore the brunt of the defense effort while Israel conserved its weapons. It raises questions about the cost to the U.S. and whether the military response is sustainable, while noting Iran still has most of its missile capacity intact and ongoing ceasefire talks offer a possible way out. The article relies on U.S. officials and experts to present its case, focusing on military spending and strategy without diving into the broader context of attacks or defense plans.