Heroic Students Rally To Stop Gunman Who Carried Out Terror Attack At Old Dominion

dailywire.com·Leif Le Mahieu
View original article
0out of 100
Elevated — multiple influence tactics active

This article tries to convince you that domestic terrorism, especially from people with certain backgrounds, is a big threat, and that self-defense by trained individuals is heroic and necessary. It does this by heavily quoting authority figures like the FBI Director and using emotional language, but it leaves out important details about the shooter's full motivations to focus solely on the 'terrorist' label.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus4/10Authority6/10Tribe5/10Emotion6/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

breaking framing
"FBI Director Kash Patel credited brave students with saving many lives by stopping a gunman who carried out a suspected terror attack at Old Dominion University on Thursday."

The opening sentence immediately establishes a breaking news scenario with dramatic elements (brave students, terror attack), designed to capture immediate attention and hint at the extraordinary nature of the event.

novelty spike
"The shooter is now deceased thanks to a group of brave students who stepped in and subdued him – actions that undoubtedly saved lives along with the quick response of law enforcement,” Patel said in a social media post."

Highlighting the direct intervention of students, leading to the shooter's death, creates a 'never before seen' or at least highly unusual scenario for a mass shooting, making the event stand out.

Authority signals

institutional authority
"FBI Director Kash Patel credited brave students with saving many lives by stopping a gunman who carried out a suspected terror attack at Old Dominion University on Thursday."

The article opens by quoting the FBI Director, instantly lending significant institutional weight to the narrative, particularly the characterization of the event and the heroism of the students. This frames the entire story through an authoritative lens.

institutional authority
"The FBI is now investigating the shooting as an act of terrorism. Our Joint Terrorism Task Force is fully engaged, embedded with local authorities, and providing all resources necessary in the investigation,” he said."

The FBI's formal declaration of a 'terrorist investigation' and the involvement of the Joint Terrorism Task Force escalates the perceived gravity and legitimizes the 'terror' framing of the event through unchallenged institutional expertise.

expert appeal
"Dominique Evans, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Norfolk office. “They basically were able to terminate the threat.”"

Quoting a 'Special Agent in Charge' of the FBI provides an expert voice to describe the students' actions, reinforcing the official narrative and the impact of their intervention. The use of 'terminate the threat' also implies official, decisive action.

Tribe signals

us vs them
"The gunman has been identified as Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, a former Virginia National Guardsman who was convicted in 2016 for conspiring to provide material support for ISIS."

Identifying the shooter as connected to ISIS immediately creates an 'us vs. them' dynamic, positioning the attacker as an external threat (Islamic extremist) against 'us' (the university, the nation, the non-terrorist populace). This leverages existing societal fears and divisions related to terrorism.

us vs them
"Evans also noted that Jalloh yelled “Allahu Akbar” during his attack."

The inclusion of this detail, especially given the shooter's prior conviction for supporting ISIS, strongly reinforces the religious and ideological 'us vs. them' framing, portraying the attack as motivated by a hostile, non-Western ideology targeting the community.

identity weaponization
"It was reported that a student member of the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) stopped the gunman with a knife. Two ROTC members were injured during the attack."

Highlighting the ROTC members as protagonists in subduing the attacker weaponizes their identity as military-affiliated individuals, positioning them as defenders and reinforcing a pro-military/police 'us' against the 'terrorist' threat. This aligns with a specific tribal identity of defense and order.

Emotion signals

outrage manufacturing
"FBI Director Kash Patel credited brave students with saving many lives by stopping a gunman who carried out a suspected terror attack at Old Dominion University on Thursday."

The immediate framing of the event as a 'suspected terror attack' combined with a shooting incident is designed to elicit outrage and immediate concern disproportionate to a 'simple' tragic shooting, tying into broader fears of terrorism that carry a higher emotional charge.

fear engineering
"The FBI is now investigating the shooting as an act of terrorism. Our Joint Terrorism Task Force is fully engaged..."

The official declaration of 'terrorism' by the FBI is a powerful fear-inducing term, activating a unique set of anxieties and perceived threats, elevating the incident beyond a typical crime.

moral superiority
"Patel said the students likely saved many lives."

Emphasizing the students as 'brave' saviors immediately positions them, and by extension, the community they represent, in a morally superior light against the evil of the attacker, fostering a sense of emotional alignment and admiration.

fear engineering
"Evans also noted that Jalloh yelled “Allahu Akbar” during his attack."

This detail is included explicitly to trigger a specific fear response tied to extremist violence, especially given the previous mention of ISIS. It's intended to evoke a visceral emotional reaction related to religiously motivated terrorism.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill the belief that "terrorism" is a clear and present domestic threat, particularly from individuals with specific backgrounds (e.g., former military members with extremist ties). It also seeks to establish that aggressive, even lethal, self-defense by trained individuals (like ROTC students) is not only justified but heroic and necessary in such situations. The heroic actions of the students, especially ROTC members, are emphasized to create a perception of brave, proactive citizens confronting danger.

Context being shifted

The article shifts the context from a general active shooter situation to a 'terror attack' by immediately introducing the FBI's 'terrorism' investigation and the shooter's past ties to ISIS, even before providing full details of the incident. This framing makes the swift, lethal response by students and the FBI's involvement appear justified and appropriate within a broader narrative of national security threats.

What it omits

The article omits details about the shooter's specific motivations beyond 'material support for ISIS' and the 'Allahu Akbar' yell. It doesn't provide information on his current status, radicalization trajectory since 2016, or any potential personal grievances or mental health issues that might have contributed to the attack. This omission steers the reader directly to the 'terrorist' label as the sole and sufficient explanation for his actions.

Desired behavior

The article implicitly grants permission for readers to view such incidents through a 'terrorism' lens, to support the swift and decisive actions taken by law enforcement and trained individuals (like ROTC), and to accept the narrative of vigilance against domestic extremist threats. It encourages a sense of gratitude for 'brave students' who act decisively in self-defense, potentially promoting the idea that trained civilians can and should intervene aggressively in such attacks.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
-
Rationalizing
-
Projecting

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

"FBI Director Kash Patel credited brave students with saving many lives by stopping a gunman who carried out a suspected terror attack at Old Dominion University on Thursday. “Earlier today, an armed individual opened fire at Old Dominion University, leaving one person dead and two others wounded. The shooter is now deceased thanks to a group of brave students who stepped in and subdued him – actions that undoubtedly saved lives along with the quick response of law enforcement,” Patel said in a social media post. ... Patel said the students likely saved many lives. “The FBI is now investigating the shooting as an act of terrorism. Our Joint Terrorism Task Force is fully engaged, embedded with local authorities, and providing all resources necessary in the investigation,” he said. ... During a press conference Thursday afternoon, the FBI spoke about the students who subdued and killed Jalloh. “There were students that were in that room that subdued him and rendered him no longer alive,” said Dominique Evans, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Norfolk office. “They basically were able to terminate the threat.” Evans also noted that Jalloh yelled “Allahu Akbar” during his attack."

-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(4)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Appeal to AuthorityJustification
"FBI Director Kash Patel credited brave students with saving many lives by stopping a gunman..."

The article opens by citing the FBI Director, an authority figure, to lend credibility and weight to the narrative about the students' actions and the nature of the event.

Causal OversimplificationSimplification
"The FBI is now investigating the shooting as an act of terrorism."

While this might be the official investigation stance, declaring it an 'act of terrorism' without further context in this initial reporting can oversimplify potentially complex motivations or mental states of the perpetrator, reducing them to a single cause (terrorism).

Appeal to ValuesJustification
"In the meantime, please pray for the victims, their families, and the ODU community."

This statement appeals to shared values of compassion, community support, and prayer, framing the response to the tragedy within a commonly accepted moral and emotional framework.

Appeal to ValuesJustification
"The safety of our campus community is my top priority. We are deeply committed to safeguarding all Monarchs and ensuring a secure learning, living, and working environment at all times."

This quote appeals to the fundamental values of safety, security, and community well-being, which resonate deeply with readers and serve to justify the university's response and actions.

Share this analysis