Trump directs US government to prepare release of files on aliens and UFOs

bbc.com·Grace Eliza Goodwin·2026-02-19
View original article
0out of 100
Elevated — multiple influence tactics active

This article uses quotes from political figures like Trump and Obama to suggest that official discussions about aliens are more about political squabbling than actual findings. It grabs your attention with the drama of these statements and aims to make you view government talk about UFOs with skepticism.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus6/10Authority7/10Tribe3/10Emotion5/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

novelty spike
"Watch: Obama gave "classified information" with alien comments, says Trump"

The headline uses a command verb ('Watch:') and immediately introduces a high-stakes, controversial claim ('classified information') from a prominent figure (Trump) about another prominent figure (Obama) regarding a highly intriguing topic (aliens), which creates a strong novelty spike to capture attention.

unprecedented framing
"Trump made the declaration in a post on Truth Social, after he accused Barack Obama earlier in the day of revealing classified information when the former president said "aliens are real" on a podcast last week."

Framing Obama's casual podcast comments as the 'revealing of classified information' by a former President, and Trump's reaction as a 'declaration,' elevates the mundane to the extraordinary, creating a sense of unprecedented political drama around the topic of aliens.

attention capture
"The US has seen renewed public interest in UFOs and extraterrestrial life in recent years, sparked in 2017 by reports about a secret Pentagon programme to probe testimony from pilots and other US military members who had reported seeing strange objects in the sky."

This sentence highlights a 'renewed public interest' and references a 'secret Pentagon programme' and 'strange objects in the sky,' which are all elements designed to pique and sustain reader curiosity and attention on the topic.

Authority signals

credential leveraging
"US President Donald Trump says he will direct US agencies, including the defence department, to "begin the process of identifying and releasing" government files on aliens and extraterrestrial life."

Leverages the authority of the 'US President' and the power to 'direct US agencies, including the defence department' to suggest that his claims about classified information and subsequent actions are significant and backed by the weight of government.

credential leveraging
"Trump made the declaration in a post on Truth Social, after he accused Barack Obama earlier in the day of revealing classified information when the former president said "aliens are real" on a podcast last week."

Trump, as a former President, accuses another 'former president' (Obama) of mishandling 'classified information.' The credibility of the accusation comes from Trump's past position and the gravitas associated with 'classified information,' creating a sense that these are serious claims from a knowledgeable source.

institutional authority
"Obama, who served as US president between 2009-17, clarified: "I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really!""

This leverages Obama's past role as 'US president' to lend significant weight to his statement about 'no evidence' of extraterrestrial contact, using his institutional authority to either confirm or deny the existence of such information.

institutional authority
"In 2022, Congress held the first hearings on UFOs in 50 years and the Pentagon promised more transparency on the matter - setting up a dedicated office to collect reports of all military UFO encounters. The following year, a US House of Representatives panel on the topic produced no major bombshells nor confirmation of alien life. In a 2024 report, the Pentagon said there was "no evidence" that the US government had encountered alien life, and that most UFO sightings were just ordinary objects."

The article uses the institutional weight of 'Congress,' 'the Pentagon,' and a 'US House of Representatives panel' to frame the discussion around government-backed inquiries into UFOs. Their findings ('no major bombshells,' 'no evidence') are presented as authoritative conclusions.

Tribe signals

us vs them
"The Democrat and Trump, a Republican, are longstanding mutual political antagonists."

Explicitly highlights the inherent 'us-vs-them' dynamic between Trump (Republican) and Obama (Democrat), framing their exchange within a broader partisan conflict, which can activate existing tribal loyalties in readers.

manufactured consensus
"For his part, Trump said on Thursday on Air Force One that while a lot of people believe in the existence of aliens, he never talks about it, and "doesn't have an opinion on it"."

Trump's statement, 'a lot of people believe in the existence of aliens,' attempts to create a sense of widespread belief or consensus around the alien phenomenon, even as he claims personal neutrality.

Emotion signals

outrage manufacturing
"Trump made the declaration in a post on Truth Social, after he accused Barack Obama earlier in the day of revealing classified information when the former president said "aliens are real" on a podcast last week. "He's not supposed to be doing that," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding: "He made a big mistake.""

Trump's accusation that Obama revealed 'classified information' and his strong statements ('He's not supposed to be doing that,' 'He made a big mistake') are designed to provoke outrage or indignation about a perceived breach of protocol or national security.

emotional fractionation
"Asked if he also thinks aliens are real, Trump answered: "Well, I don't know if they're real or not." ... For his part, Trump said on Thursday on Air Force One that while a lot of people believe in the existence of aliens, he never talks about it, and "doesn't have an opinion on it". Then a few hours later, he posted on Truth Social that "based on the tremendous interest shown" he will seek the release of files "related to alien and extraterrestrial life...""

This sequence shows Trump vacillating between claiming no opinion on aliens and then, hours later, announcing a major initiative to release alien files 'based on tremendous interest.' This creates an emotional seesaw, first denying certainty and then exciting anticipation, playing on reader curiosity and speculation.

urgency
"Trump made the declaration in a post on Truth Social, after he accused Barack Obama earlier in the day of revealing classified information when the former president said "aliens are real" on a podcast last week. "He's not supposed to be doing that," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding: "He made a big mistake.""

The framing of Obama's comments as potentially exposing 'classified information' and Trump's immediate public reaction, including promises of action, instills a sense of urgency and high stakes around the topic, suggesting immediate attention is required for a potentially serious issue.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill the belief that government discourse surrounding extraterrestrial life is characterized by political posturing and a lack of consistent, verifiable information. It attempts to make the reader believe that high-profile figures use the topic for political leverage and that official disclosures are often underwhelming or contradictory.

Context being shifted

The article shifts the context from the scientific or existential implications of extraterrestrial life to a political narrative of 'gotcha' moments and accusations of mishandling information between former and current presidents.

What it omits

The article omits deeper exploration of the actual content of the 'secret Pentagon program' or the details of the 'testimony from pilots' mentioned, which could provide a more substantial understanding of the renewed public interest beyond political spectacle. It also doesn't elaborate on the specific 'classified information' Obama allegedly revealed, leaving the accusation vague and primarily a vehicle for Trump's commentary.

Desired behavior

The reader is nudged towards skepticism regarding official statements on UFOs and aliens, particularly when such statements are politicized. They might feel permission to dismiss the topic as primarily a political football rather than a serious subject of inquiry, or to view claims from politicians on this matter with cynicism.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
-
Rationalizing
!
Projecting

"Trump made the declaration in a post on Truth Social, after he accused Barack Obama earlier in the day of revealing classified information when the former president said 'aliens are real' on a podcast last week. 'He's not supposed to be doing that,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding: 'He made a big mistake.'"

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

"Trump made the declaration in a post on Truth Social, after he accused Barack Obama earlier in the day of revealing classified information... For his part, Trump said on Thursday on Air Force One that while a lot of people believe in the existence of aliens, he never talks about it, and 'doesn't have an opinion on it'. Then a few hours later, he posted on Truth Social that 'based on the tremendous interest shown' he will seek the release of files..."

-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(4)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Questioning the ReputationAttack on Reputation
"Obama gave "classified information" with alien comments, says Trump"

Trump publicly asserts that Obama revealed classified information, directly attacking Obama's judgment and trustworthiness as a former president without providing evidence of the information being classified or its source.

DoubtAttack on Reputation
"There was no indication that Obama relied on classified information when he gave the interview."

This sentence implicitly casts doubt on Trump's assertion that Obama shared classified information. By stating 'no indication,' it challenges the premise of Trump's claim without directly refuting it, thereby questioning the credibility of Trump's allegation.

Name Calling/LabelingAttack on Reputation
"The Democrat and Trump, a Republican, are longstanding mutual political antagonists."

Labeling Obama and Trump as 'political antagonists' frames their interactions within a negative, combative political rivalry, potentially coloring how readers interpret their statements about each other.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"He made a big mistake."

Trump’s statement exaggerates the severity of Obama's alleged transgression (revealing classified information), presenting it as a 'big mistake' to heighten the perceived wrongdoing.

Share this analysis