Salvadorans deported by Trump to Bukele’s mega‑prison fight against being forgotten

english.elpais.com·Nicholas Dale Leal
View original article
0out of 100
Noticeable — persuasion techniques worth noting

This article aims to convince you that U.S. immigration policies, particularly deportations to El Salvador under the Trump administration, are unjust and cruel, leading to severe human rights abuses. It leverages emotional stories and highlights the suffering of deported individuals and their families to evoke strong sympathy and outrage against both the U.S. and Salvadoran governments, making their claims seem unquestionable without fully detailing the legal reasons for the deportations or the Salvadoran government's perspective.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus3/10Authority4/10Tribe4/10Emotion8/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

unprecedented framing
"The situation became the first major scandal to erupt over the second Trump administration’s immigration policy."

This frames the event as a significant, perhaps unprecedented, and attention-grabbing scandal under an administration.

Authority signals

institutional authority
"Human Rights Watch said they had been forcibly disappeared."

Leverages the credibility and perceived authority of Human Rights Watch to validate claims of disappearance, adding weight to the narrative.

institutional authority
"and even the Inter‑American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) has ordered precautionary measures on their behalf."

Utilizes the institutional weight of the IACHR to highlight the perceived gravity and international recognition of the issue.

Tribe signals

us vs them
"Kilmar Abrego García, who has become a symbol of the U.S. government’s cruelty and contempt for the law."

Establishes a clear 'us' (the victims, Kilmar) vs. 'them' (the U.S. government) dynamic, implying a villain in the narrative.

us vs them
"But the families held on, clinging to the faint hope that came from recognizing their sons, nephews, and brothers in another photo published by Bukele."

Creates a division between the suffering families and the perceived indifference or antagonism of Bukele's government.

Emotion signals

fear engineering
"All I want is to know about my son. It’s almost been a year since they took him."

Evokes a strong sense of fear and desperation from a parent directly impacted by the events, designed to resonate with the reader's empathy.

outrage manufacturing
"...accused without evidence of being gang members. They were deported even though an emergency court order was issued while they were in the air."

Aims to generate outrage by highlighting actions perceived as unjust and illegal, particularly the disregard for a court order and lack of evidence.

outrage manufacturing
"His fate was confirmed a few days later when, to mark the Salvadoran president’s visit to Washington, the White House published a list of some of the “cold-blooded criminals deported to El Salvador.” Elmer’s name was on the list, where he was described as a convicted sex offender. Josué insists that’s a lie."

Creates outrage by presenting a narrative of false accusation and reputational damage by official sources, followed by an immediate denial from a family member, suggesting injustice.

emotional fractionation
"The past year has shattered the life she once had. Her husband is depressed and no longer leaves the house; her other son recently became a father, but even that has not eased the memory of the day his brother Brandon was arrested and he saw him for the last time; and she lost her office job a few months ago because, constantly distracted, she could no longer perform. The world has moved on, but they cannot — and do not want to — forget."

This passage uses a series of emotional blows – depression, shattered life, loss of employment, and lingering trauma – to create a cumulative effect of despair and injustice, emotionally fracturing the reader with multiple points of suffering.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill the belief that the Trump administration's immigration policies, particularly deportations to El Salvador, are profoundly unjust, cruel, and operate without due process, leading to severe human rights abuses. It wants the reader to believe that the U.S. government is responsible for the 'disappearance' and suffering of these individuals, and that the Salvadoran government under Bukele is complicit in their rights violations. The article also targets the belief that these deportees, despite any accusations, are victims of a flawed and inhumane system.

Context being shifted

The article shifts the context from a focus on the legal justifications or processes behind deportations (e.g., crimes committed, immigration violations, national security concerns) to one solely centered on the emotional suffering of families and the humanitarian crisis perceived to be caused by these policies. It presents the lack of contact and judicial process in El Salvador as an inherent outcome of the U.S. government's actions, making those actions seem inherently evil.

What it omits

The article largely omits detailed information regarding the specific legal grounds for the deportations (beyond vague accusations of being 'gang members' for the Venezuelans and a 'substance-abuse charge' for Elmer, alongside an unproven 'convicted sex offender' label). It also largely omits the Salvadoran government's stated rationale for its prison system and handling of alleged criminals (e.g., its crackdown on gangs), which, while potentially controversial, would provide a more complete picture of why the deportees are being held without contact. The severity of the alleged crimes for which some individuals were initially detained in the U.S. is also downplayed or presented as false without substantiation, making their deportation seem more egregious.

Desired behavior

The article seeks to evoke strong sympathy and empathy for the deported individuals and their families, fostering outrage towards the U.S. and Salvadoran governments. It implicitly grants permission for the reader to condemn these immigration policies and the governments involved, to distrust official narratives regarding deportees, and to support human rights activism aimed at challenging such policies.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
-
Rationalizing
!
Projecting

"Blame for specific wrongdoing or harmful actions is projected onto the U.S. government and the Trump administration: 'Kilmar Abrego García, who has become a symbol of the U.S. government’s cruelty and contempt for the law.' The article also implies U.S. responsibility for the Salvadoran government's actions: 'The five Salvadorans who arrived in El Salvador on the same flights a year ago remain lost within Bukele’s prisons, without contact with their families or lawyers.' This links their current plight directly to the U.S. deportation decision."

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
-
Controlled release (spokesperson test)
-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(4)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"who has become a symbol of the U.S. government’s cruelty and contempt for the law"

The phrase 'cruelty and contempt for the law' uses emotionally charged words to describe the U.S. government's actions, aiming to evoke a strong negative reaction from the reader rather than simply stating facts.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"remain effectively disappeared, according to Human Rights Watch"

While referencing Human Rights Watch, 'effectively disappeared' is an emotionally charged term that implies an intentional and severe deprivation of liberty and communication, framing the situation in the most negative light possible.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"Now, 12 months after the nightmare began"

Describing the situation as a 'nightmare' is an emotionally charged exaggeration of the difficulties faced, aiming to amplify the sense of suffering and injustice.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"The past year has shattered the life she once had."

The word 'shattered' is emotionally loaded and dramatic, implying complete destruction and ruin of a life, which is disproportionate to the described consequences of job loss and family depression, aiming to elicit strong sympathy.

Share this analysis