"The following 2025 request from the BBC was accidentally sent out prior to a broadcast: “We want someone who is going to be critical of Netanyahu and the ground offense (concern about remaining hostages, stretching the IDF capacity, destruction of Gaza or any other reason). Do you think you can help with this?""

This BBC request is framed as a leaked, 'accidentally sent out' document, creating a sense of privileged information and an unexpected revelation to capture attention.

"And in truth, since October 7 we Jews have been brutalized, and now it is time that we behave like brutes, which is the only language the savages in Gaza, Judea and Samaria, the savages in the western universities and the savages in the international media understand."

The phrase 'time that we behave like brutes' along with the assertion that this is 'the only language' creates a stark, seemingly unprecedented call to action that aims to shock and focus the reader's attention on a radical shift in approach.

"As of today, the international task force that will patrol and operate in Gaza might soon come into force, but only after Israel loses more precious soldiers while destroying the newly armed, well-fed and thoroughly rested Hamas savages."

This sentence uses vivid, emotionally charged language ('precious soldiers,' 'Hamas savages') to create a dramatic scenario that draws the reader's attention to an urgent and critical situation.

"Robert Besser is a news editor who has worked in television and newspapers in the United States, Asia and the Middle East."

The author's bio is provided at the beginning to establish credibility and experience in media, aiming for the reader to implicitly trust his analysis of media behavior.

"In fact, it was a full 21 months later, on September 20, 1943, that the Americans were confident enough that they would win the war that they allowed Life Magazine to publish the first picture of a dead American soldier. And still, that decision was so sensitive that it had to be made in the White House Oval Office."

The reference to the US government's decision regarding wartime censorship, particularly the detail about the 'White House Oval Office,' invokes the weight and legitimacy of past high-level governmental actions to justify the argument for current censorship.

"In January 2024, Politico reported that Biden “administration officials fear the blackout will make it difficult for anyone to know what is happening between Hamas and the Israeli military as the war in Gaza continues…."

Citing 'Politico reported' and 'Biden administration officials' lends an air of official concern and reinforces the idea that the proposed actions are being discussed and feared at high levels of government.

"Since October 7, 2023, the antisemetic images of the war in Gaza, which have been enthusiastically distributed by international journalists, have placed Israel into the leftists’ hangman’s noose, and then drawn tight by their social media, television news and newspapers."

This quote immediately establishes an 'us vs. them' dynamic, pitting 'Israel' and implicitly 'Jews' against 'international journalists' and 'leftists,' portrayed as actively hostile and dangerous.

"Because of the great harm done to Israel since October 7 by those journalists of the leftist religion, it is clearly in Israel’s national interest to block all images coming out of Gaza during the expected battle to at last crush Hamas."

Labeling journalists as belonging to a 'leftist religion' not only creates an 'us vs. them' but weaponizes 'leftist' as a negative identity, framing their actions as ideologically (religiously) motivated harm against Israel.

"And please……let’s not hear any more nonsense about the rights of journalists, about the importance of democracy or the free flow of information.Rather, let us only be concerned with the survival of the Jewish people. Beyond the survival of the Jews, there is nothing to discuss."

This creates an absolute 'us vs. them' choice: either prioritize 'rights of journalists/democracy' or 'the survival of the Jewish people,' implying that the former is a frivolous concern when Jewish survival is at stake.

"Within Israel, many on the left will reflexibly scream if the international press is restricted in Gaza. But we have learned that these leftist Jews are only concerned about promoting a free press when publishing their own news is guaranteed to harm Israel."

This passage attempts to delegitimize dissenting voices, particularly 'leftist Jews,' by questioning their motivations and implying their concerns are disingenuous and harmful to Israel, thereby creating fear of social opprobrium for holding such views.

"And in truth, since October 7 we Jews have been brutalized, and now it is time that we behave like brutes, which is the only language the savages in Gaza, Judea and Samaria, the savages in the western universities and the savages in the international media understand."

This quote profoundly weaponizes identity ('we Jews' vs. 'savages' in multiple groups including 'western universities' and 'international media'). It dehumanizes those opposed to the proposed action and elevates the in-group ('we Jews') to a position of having suffered brutality that justifies brutal, uncompromising action, further solidifying an 'us vs. them' dynamic.

"Since October 7, 2023, the antisemetic images of the war in Gaza, which have been enthusiastically distributed by international journalists, have placed Israel into the leftists’ hangman’s noose, and then drawn tight by their social media, television news and newspapers."

This statement uses highly charged language ('antisemetic images,' 'hangman's noose') to evoke strong outrage and a sense of betrayal against international journalists and 'leftists' for their alleged role in harming Israel.

"the government will be equally unprepared to prevent yet another worldwide media pogrom of antisemetic hysteria perpetrated by international news organizations who libel Israel, adding fuel to worldwide Jew hatred and guaranteeing more violence and dead Jews."

This quote explicitly engineers fear by conjuring the image of a 'worldwide media pogrom' leading to 'antisemetic hysteria,' 'Jew hatred,' 'violence,' and 'dead Jews,' creating an existential threat linked to continued media access.

"But forbid heaven that the Jews make the lives of Hamas baby-killers and rapists uncomfortable."

This statement frames the argument in terms of moral outrage, asserting that it would be an absurd and morally reprehensible double standard to prevent Israel from acting forcefully against 'Hamas baby-killers and rapists,' thereby granting moral superiority to the proposed harsh actions.

"And reflecting the dangerously empty head of the then-leader of the free world, here is what Biden’s National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson said about Israel closing down the phones of the Gazans:"

The phrase 'dangerously empty head' is a direct personal attack meant to induce contempt and outrage towards President Biden and his administration, framing their concerns as foolish and ignorant.

"So what is our choice as we head towards the final battles in Gaza? How can we prevent the anti-Jewish media from once again acting as Hamas mouthpieces, and knowingly transmitting lies and falsified pictures about Israel and the IDF?"

The phrases 'final battles in Gaza' and 'prevent the anti-Jewish media from once again acting as Hamas mouthpieces' create a sense of immediate, high-stakes urgency and danger, implying that without immediate action, catastrophic emotional and reputational harm will occur.

"And in truth, since October 7 we Jews have been brutalized, and now it is time that we behave like brutes, which is the only language the savages in Gaza, Judea and Samaria, the savages in the western universities and the savages in the international media understand."

This statement combines several emotional spikes. It evokes strong empathy and shared victimhood with 'we Jews have been brutalized,' then shifts abruptly to a call for aggressive, almost vengeful action ('behave like brutes'), justifying it as the only effective response to the dehumanized 'savages.' This whips emotions from victimhood to righteous aggression.