Trump touts a 'roaring economy' in his State of Union as Americans continue to struggle

nbcnews.com·By Jonathan Allen
View original article
0out of 100
Noticeable — persuasion techniques worth noting

This article uses strong language and appeals to emotion to frame President Trump's economic claims as out of touch with public opinion. It criticizes Republicans for supporting him, implying their support is uncritical, and doesn't fully explain some of Trump's proposals, which leaves the reader with a partial picture.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus2/10Authority3/10Tribe5/10Emotion6/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

novelty spike
"Trump opened on a more nonpartisan note, bringing the gold medal-winning U.S. Olympic men's hockey team into the gallery above the House floor to a standing ovation from both sides of the aisle and chants of "USA!""

This event, while seemingly positive, serves as a novelty spike to capture and retain audience attention, temporarily shifting focus from divisive political rhetoric to a unifying national achievement.

Authority signals

institutional authority
"Trump vowed to maintain unilateral tariffs on foreign goods despite an adverse Supreme Court decision, promising that 'these powerful, country-saving, peace-protecting tariffs will remain in place under fully approved and tested alternative legal statutes.'"

Trump asserts his resolve to bypass or reinterpret a Supreme Court decision, leveraging the perceived authority of the presidency to override institutional checks and balances, implying his actions are above judicial review through 'alternative legal statutes'.

expert appeal
"He said the levies, which most economists say are paid for primarily by Americans, will eventually replace the income tax."

The article itself brings in the authority of 'most economists' to contradict the president's claim, though the president is attempting to exert his own authority. This signal describes the article's own use of expert opinion, even if it's in contrast to the subject's claims.

Tribe signals

us vs them
"In a speech laced with insults for his Democratic adversaries — and punctuated by a heated exchange with several lawmakers over his deportation campaign — Trump insisted that the 'affordability' message that helped Democrats win off-year elections in Virginia, New Jersey and New York last year is a figment of their own creation. 'They caused and created the increased prices that all of our citizens have to endure,' he said, turning his gaze toward the Democratic side of the chamber. 'You caused that problem!' He added that Democrats 'knew their statements were a dirty, rotten lie.'"

This directly creates a strong us-vs-them dynamic, blaming 'Democratic adversaries' for economic problems and painting their political statements as 'dirty, rotten lie,' clearly dividing the political landscape into hostile camps.

us vs them
"Trump said Democrats should 'be ashamed of yourselves' for not standing when he said, 'The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.'"

This quote creates an us-vs-them narrative by positioning 'American citizens' against 'illegal aliens' and shaming Democrats for not aligning with this stance, thereby weaponizing patriotism and immigration policy as tribal markers.

Emotion signals

outrage manufacturing
"Trump said Democrats should 'be ashamed of yourselves' for not standing when he said, 'The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.' Reps. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., yelled back, 'You have killed Americans!'"

This exchange is engineered to provoke outrage on multiple fronts: Trump's shaming of Democrats and the legislators' counter-accusation of 'You have killed Americans!' are highly emotionally charged and designed to elicit strong reactions from readers.

fear engineering
"As presidents often do, Trump saved his assessment of America's global position for the end of his remarks. What was different Tuesday night is that he has been locked in brinkmanship with Iran, and top congressional leaders were given a classified briefing on the topic earlier in the day. Trump praised the June mission that he said at the time had knocked out Iran's nuclear capabilities. And then he said the regime in Tehran is 'pursing their sinister nuclear ambitions.' 'My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy,' he said. 'But one thing is certain: I will never allow the world's No. 1 sponsor of terror to have a nuclear weapon.'"

This section leverages fear by reminding readers of 'brinkmanship with Iran,' highlighting 'sinister nuclear ambitions' and labeling Iran the 'world's No. 1 sponsor of terror.' This is designed to create anxiety and support for firm action against perceived threats.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill the belief that President Trump's positive portrayal of the nation's state, particularly the economy, is out of touch with the reality experienced by Americans. It works to make the reader believe that Trump's claims are based on statistics and policies that do not align with public perception and his leadership is not widely approved. The article also suggests that Republicans are uncritically aligning with Trump despite public dissatisfaction.

Context being shifted

The article shifts the context from the President's prepared remarks and stated vision to the immediate public and political reaction. By emphasizing polling data and quotes from opposition figures directly against Trump's statements, it makes skepticism and criticism of Trump's claims feel 'normal' and well-substantiated by public opinion. It also shifts the context of legislative proposals from potential policy solutions to partisan gridlock.

What it omits

The article omits detailed explanations of the specific 'alternative legal statutes' Trump mentioned for tariffs, which could provide context on the legality of his continued action. It also omits the full substance or specific positive details of the 'controversial 2025 tax cut' or the 'Trump accounts' beyond the claim of potential growth, which would allow readers to more fully evaluate Trump's economic propositions. The article also briefly mentions Trump's 'June mission that he said at the time had knocked out Iran's nuclear capabilities' but provides no further context or evaluation of this claim or the current status of Iran's nuclear program.

Desired behavior

The reader is nudged toward skepticism regarding President Trump's statements and policies, particularly his economic claims and leadership effectiveness. It encourages the reader to question the validity of his assertions and to view Republican support for him as politically motivated rather than based on policy success. It also implicitly grants permission to dismiss aspects of his address as disingenuous or out of touch.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
-
Rationalizing
!
Projecting

"He added that Democrats 'knew their statements were a dirty, rotten lie.'"

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

""House Republicans are proud to stand with President Trump to keep our majority and continue advancing an agenda focused on safety, opportunity, and common sense," Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said in a statement. "The choice couldn’t be clearer as we continue building an America that works again.""

-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(10)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Flag WavingJustification
"Declaring "a turnaround for the ages," President Donald Trump offered a version of America's standing in his State of the Union address Tuesday night that is at odds with the perceptions of the electorate. Wearing a red power tie with a flag pin on the lapel of his navy suit and speaking to a joint session of Congress in the House chamber, Trump rolled off a list of statistics and policies to support his view that the nation is "back bigger, better, richer and stronger than ever before" — a "golden age of America.""

This quote describes Trump's rhetorical strategy of portraying the nation in an exceptionally positive light, using phrases like 'turnaround for the ages' and 'golden age of America,' combined with symbols like a flag pin, to evoke national pride and identity to gain support for his message.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"He vowed to maintain unilateral tariffs on foreign goods despite an adverse Supreme Court decision, promising that "these powerful, country-saving, peace-protecting tariffs will remain in place under fully approved and tested alternative legal statutes.""

The phrases 'powerful,' 'country-saving,' and 'peace-protecting' are emotionally charged and designed to evoke positive feelings and agreement with the policy, rather than offering a neutral description of the tariffs.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"A "roaring economy," Trump said near the start of his record-breaking 1-hour, 47-minute speech, "is roaring like never before.""

The phrase 'roaring like never before' is an exaggeration, presenting the economy's performance in an extreme and highly positive light that may not align with objective data or the perceptions of the electorate mentioned elsewhere in the article.

Causal OversimplificationSimplification
"He added that Democrats "knew their statements were a dirty, rotten lie.""

Trump attributes economic problems solely to the Democrats, claiming they 'caused and created the increased prices.' This simplifies a complex economic issue by attributing it to a single cause or group, ignoring other potential factors.

Name Calling/LabelingAttack on Reputation
"He added that Democrats "knew their statements were a dirty, rotten lie.""

Calling statements a 'dirty, rotten lie' applies a negative and emotionally charged label to the Democrats' arguments, discrediting them through insult rather than substantive counter-argument.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy," he said. "But one thing is certain: I will never allow the world's No. 1 sponsor of terror to have a nuclear weapon.""

Labeling Iran as 'the world's No. 1 sponsor of terror' is emotionally charged language intended to evoke fear and strong negative sentiment, justifying a firm stance against the country.

SlogansCall
"He repeated his mantra that he believes in "peace through strength.""

'Peace through strength' is a concise, memorable phrase that summarizes a political philosophy or goal, functioning as a slogan to convey a message efficiently.

Flag WavingJustification
"As he gets ready to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence this summer, Trump made repeated references to the founders and the longevity of the American experiment."

By repeatedly referencing the founders and the 'longevity of the American experiment' in the context of celebrating the Declaration of Independence, Trump appeals to national pride and shared historical identity, using these values to bolster his position.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"He kept trying to pull rabbits out of a hat, lying to Americans that everything is perfect while people struggle to pay for groceries, rent and child care," Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, said. "He couldn't explain away his reckless tariffs, dangerous foreign policy or why his administration is still hiding millions of Epstein files.""

Rep. Castro's statement 'lying to Americans that everything is perfect' is an exaggeration of Trump's claims. While Trump presented a highly optimistic view, characterizing it as 'everything is perfect' maximizes the perceived dishonesty.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"He kept trying to pull rabbits out of a hat, lying to Americans that everything is perfect while people struggle to pay for groceries, rent and child care," Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, said. "He couldn't explain away his reckless tariffs, dangerous foreign policy or why his administration is still hiding millions of Epstein files.""

The terms 'reckless tariffs' and 'dangerous foreign policy' are emotionally charged descriptions designed to elicit negative reactions towards Trump's policies, rather than neutrally describing them.

Share this analysis