Stockpiling food, sealing windows: Iranians brace for possible war

ynetnews.com·AFP
View original article
0out of 100
High — clear manipulation patterns detected

This article tries to convince you that a war between the US/Israel and Iran is about to happen and can't be avoided. It does this mainly by playing on your emotions, making you feel fear and alarm about the situation without giving a full picture of all the diplomatic efforts and different viewpoints involved.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus3/10Authority2/10Tribe1/10Emotion7/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

attention capture
"Fears have surged after Trump said he is considering a strike and US forces expanded their presence in the region, reviving memories of last summer’s 12-day conflict and a fragile ceasefire"

This opening statement immediately frames the situation as a rapidly escalating crisis with high stakes, designed to capture immediate attention due to the implied threat of widespread conflict.

novelty spike
"speculation grows that another round of fighting could erupt in the coming days."

The phrase 'could erupt in the coming days' introduces an immediate, impending sense of new and significant events about to unfold, creating a novelty spike.

Authority signals

institutional authority
"speaking to Agence France-Presse."

The inclusion of 'Agence France-Presse' as the source for the quote implicitly lends credibility and institutional weight to the quotes from residents, suggesting professional journalistic backing.

Tribe signals

us vs them
"Iran has warned that in the event of an attack, Israel would be considered a legitimate target, along with U.S. bases in the Middle East."

This quote, while reporting a warning, inherently highlights the 'us-vs-them' dynamic between Iran and its adversaries (Israel, US) in the context of potential conflict.

Emotion signals

fear engineering
"Fears have surged after Trump said he is considering a strike and US forces expanded their presence in the region, reviving memories of last summer’s 12-day conflict and a fragile ceasefire"

The article's opening line immediately establishes a tone of fear, using words like 'fears have surged' and 'reviving memories of conflict' to evoke anxiety.

fear engineering
"“I sleep badly at night, even with medication,” said Hamid, a retiree in Tehran"

This direct quote from a resident uses personal testimony to directly convey and amplify fear, making it relatable and visceral.

fear engineering
"“I think a war between Iran, the U.S. and Israel is inevitable,” said Mina Ahmadvand, an information technology worker in Tehran."

This quote expresses a strong sense of impending doom and inevitability of war, designed to elevate the reader's sense of fear and apprehension.

fear engineering
"“I can’t sleep at night anymore. I have nightmares where I am being chased and I die,” she said. “I go to bed late, wake up late and I am depressed.”"

This highly emotional and vivid description of psychological distress ('nightmares,' 'chased and die,' 'depressed') is a potent appeal to the reader's empathy and fear, emphasizing the human cost of the perceived threat.

fear engineering
"A recent nighttime thunderstorm in Tehran and fireworks marking the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution were enough to alarm some residents, who initially feared fighting had resumed."

This detail illustrates the heightened state of fear among residents, showing how ordinary events are misinterpreted as signs of conflict, thus reinforcing the sense of pervasive dread.

urgency
"“Now with this situation, we are waiting to see what happens. I think war will break out within 10 days.”"

The 'within 10 days' statement creates a strong sense of urgency and impending crisis, prompting an emotional response about the immediacy of the threat rather than a reasoned evaluation.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill a belief that a major military conflict between the US/Israel and Iran is imminent and inevitable, leading to widespread fear and anxiety among the Iranian populace.

Context being shifted

The article shifts the context from a nuanced diplomatic and geopolitical situation to one primarily focused on the emotional state and anxieties of ordinary Iranian citizens facing imminent war. This centers the narrative on the human-interest aspect of fear and preparation, making the idea of war feel more immediate and unavoidable.

What it omits

The article omits significant diplomatic efforts, international negotiations, or alternative perspectives on the likelihood of conflict, such as official statements from US or Iranian leadership regarding de-escalation, or analyses from international bodies. It also omits the broader geopolitical objectives and strategies of the involved parties, reducing the situation to 'Trump is considering a strike' and US forces expanding presence, without detailing the reasons or specific parameters.

Desired behavior

The reader is subtly nudged to accept the narrative of unavoidable conflict between the US/Israel and Iran, to empathize with the 'fearing' Iranian citizens, and potentially to view any aggressive moves by the US/Israel as a response to an already tense and seemingly unresolvable situation, thus normalizing the idea of escalation.

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
-
Rationalizing
-
Projecting

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

""I sleep badly at night, even with medication,” said Hamid, a retiree in Tehran, speaking to Agence France-Presse. Others described similar fears as speculation grows that another round of fighting could erupt in the coming days. ... “I think a war between Iran, the U.S. and Israel is inevitable,” said Mina Ahmadvand, an information technology worker in Tehran. “Everything changes by the hour.” ... “I can’t sleep at night anymore. I have nightmares where I am being chased and I die,” she said. “I go to bed late, wake up late and I am depressed.”"

-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(17)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Appeal to Fear/PrejudiceJustification
"Fears have surged after Trump said he is considering a strike and US forces expanded their presence in the region, reviving memories of last summer’s 12-day conflict and a fragile ceasefire"

This quote immediately sets a tone of fear by highlighting the surge of fears and recalling past conflicts, aiming to evoke concern in the reader rather than presenting information neutrally.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Fears have surged"

The word 'surged' is emotionally charged, suggesting an overwhelming and uncontrollable increase in fear, which amplifies the perceived severity of the situation.

RepetitionManipulative Wording
"memories remain fresh of the 12-day conflict in June that ended in a fragile ceasefire."

The article repeatedly references the '12-day conflict' and its 'fragile ceasefire,' reinforcing the instability and potential for renewed violence in the reader's mind, making these points seem more salient.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"fragile ceasefire"

The word 'fragile' implicitly suggests that the peace is tenuous and easily broken, adding to the sense of imminent conflict and instability.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"bracing for the possibility of a broader conflict"

The phrase 'bracing for' suggests an defensive posture in anticipation of a severe and unavoidable event, thus intensifying the perception of threat.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"fueled anxiety"

The verb 'fueled' implies that the deployment directly ignited and intensified existing anxieties, attributing a strong negative emotional response to the military presence.

Appeal to Fear/PrejudiceJustification
"“I sleep badly at night, even with medication,” said Hamid, a retiree in Tehran, speaking to Agence France-Presse. Others described similar fears as speculation grows that another round of fighting could erupt in the coming days."

The inclusion of personal anecdotes about inability to sleep due to fear directly appeals to the reader's emotions, emphasizing the distressing impact of the situation on everyday people and thus intensifying the sense of a looming threat.

Appeal to Fear/PrejudiceJustification
"I have nightmares where I am being chased and I die,” she said. “I go to bed late, wake up late and I am depressed.”"

This quote is a direct appeal to fear and sympathy by detailing deeply personal mental suffering (nightmares, depression) caused by the conflict, aiming to provoke a strong emotional reaction in the reader about the human cost of the situation.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"a surprise attack"

The word 'surprise' highlights the unexpected and aggressive nature of the attack, creating a sense of vulnerability and danger.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"“Everything changes by the hour.”"

This statement conveys a sense of rapid, unpredictable, and uncontrollable escalation, contributing to an atmosphere of uncertainty and heightened tension.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"A recent nighttime thunderstorm in Tehran and fireworks marking the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution were enough to alarm some residents, who initially feared fighting had resumed."

This statement exaggerates the level of fear by implying that ordinary, non-military sounds could be mistaken for warfare, suggesting extreme anxiety among the populace.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Iran has warned that in the event of an attack, Israel would be considered a legitimate target, along with U.S. bases in the Middle East."

The term 'legitimate target' from Iran's perspective is presented without counterbalancing context, potentially amplifying the perceived threat and the justification for retaliation.

DoubtAttack on Reputation
"Trump has cited a figure of more than 30,000 protesters killed during demonstrations in January, a claim that differs from other estimates."

By stating that Trump's claim 'differs from other estimates,' the article implicitly casts doubt on the accuracy or credibility of his reported figure without directly refuting it or providing concrete evidence of its falsehood.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"deliberately targeting protesters"

The word 'deliberately' implies malicious intent and adds a strong negative emotional charge to the actions of the Iranian security forces.

Name Calling/LabelingAttack on Reputation
"what they describe as terrorists backed by Israel and the United States."

The Iranian authorities' labeling of those responsible as 'terrorists' is a clear instance of name-calling, used to discredit and demonize a group without substantive argument.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"“Since the protests, my life has been on pause,” Haniyeh said. “Now with this situation, we are waiting to see what happens. I think war will break out within 10 days.”"

The phrase 'life has been on pause' conveys a sense of stagnation and despair, while the direct prediction of war 'within 10 days' creates a highly urgent and alarming tone.

Appeal to Fear/PrejudiceJustification
"“I bought about 10 cans of food, including tuna and beans, as well as cookies, bottled water and spare batteries,” Ahmadvand said. “I don’t wish for war, but we must not take the situation lightly.”"

This quote highlights the practical fear of conflict by describing a citizen stocking emergency supplies, framing the situation as serious enough to warrant such precautions and implying that the reader, too, should 'not take the situation lightly.'

Share this analysis