DHS Celebrates 23rd Anniversary Amid Budget Battle And New Middle East Conflict

dailywire.com·Drew Berkemeyer
View original article
0out of 100
Elevated — multiple influence tactics active

This article tries to convince you that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is doing a fantastic job keeping the country safe, especially under its current leadership. It does this by featuring statements from officials and using strong emotional language, while leaving out any critical details or opposing viewpoints that might make you question DHS's successes.

FATE Analysis

Four dimensions of psychological manipulation: how content captures Focus, exploits Authority, triggers Tribal identity, and engineers Emotion.

Focus3/10Authority6/10Tribe5/10Emotion6/10
FFocus
0/10
AAuthority
0/10
TTribe
0/10
EEmotion
0/10

Focus signals

novelty spike
"The Department of Homeland Security is marking its 23rd anniversary Sunday, celebrating more than two decades since its creation in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, even as the agency finds itself in the crosshairs of Democrats amid a partial government shutdown."

The 'anniversary' framing, especially when combined with current political conflict, creates a sense of a significant, noteworthy event demanding attention.

attention capture
"With conflict recently erupting in Iran, Noem also emphasized vigilance at home, writing on X that she is “in direct coordination with our federal intelligence and law enforcement partners as we continue to closely monitor and thwart any potential threats to the homeland.”"

Tying the agency's work to a recent, high-profile international conflict immediately captures the reader's attention due to its perceived relevance and urgency.

Authority signals

institutional authority
"The Department of Homeland Security is marking its 23rd anniversary Sunday, celebrating more than two decades since its creation in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks..."

Leverages the institutional weight and historical significance of DHS, an agency created in response to a major national tragedy, to lend gravitas to its current operations and statements.

expert appeal
"“As the threat landscape continues to evolve, DHS is there. By air, land, sea, or in cyberspace, the DHS workforce boldly confronts the threats our nation faces every day,” Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement marking the anniversary."

Presents statements from the Secretary of DHS, a high-ranking official, as authoritative pronouncements on the agency's importance and effectiveness. The phrase 'boldly confronts the threats our nation faces' is presented as an expert assessment.

institutional authority
"According to a statement from the department obtained by The Daily Wire, Border Patrol has recorded nine consecutive months of zero migrant releases at the southern border, ending what officials describe as the Biden administration’s “catch and release” policy."

Relies on official 'department' and 'officials' statements to provide factual claims, attributing credibility to the institution itself. The 'zero migrant releases' claim uses the institutional source to validate a significant achievement.

institutional authority
"Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the department says, arrested 1,538 known or suspected terrorists and removed 1,534, along with thousands of gang members tied to groups such as Tren de Aragua and MS-13."

Uses the department's direct reporting and specific statistics ('1,538 known or suspected terrorists') to assert effectiveness, making the claims more persuasive by tying them to an official, authoritative source.

Tribe signals

us vs them
"The Department of Homeland Security is marking its 23rd anniversary Sunday... even as the agency finds itself in the crosshairs of Democrats amid a partial government shutdown."

Establishes an immediate 'us vs. them' dynamic between DHS (and by extension, the current administration lauded in the article) and 'Democrats' who are putting the agency 'in the crosshairs,' framing them as opposing forces.

us vs them
"Under President Donald Trump and Secretary Noem, department officials point to a slate of enforcement and security actions over the past year as evidence that DHS is fulfilling its founding mission."

Creates a favorable 'us' (Trump/Noem administration and DHS) by highlighting their perceived successes, implicitly contrasting them with prior administrations or opposing political views.

us vs them
"Border Patrol has recorded nine consecutive months of zero migrant releases at the southern border, ending what officials describe as the Biden administration’s “catch and release” policy."

Directly creates an 'us vs. them' dynamic by presenting the current DHS actions under Trump/Noem as successfully ending a policy attributed to the 'Biden administration,' aligning readers with the 'successful' approach against the 'failed' prior one.

us vs them
"That aggressive enforcement posture has fueled Democratic opposition and contributed to the funding standoff now affecting the department."

Reinforces the 'us vs. them' narrative by explicitly stating that 'Democratic opposition' is the cause of the department's funding issues, painting one side as obstructionist against the backdrop of national security.

Emotion signals

fear engineering
"The Department of Homeland Security is marking its 23rd anniversary Sunday, celebrating more than two decades since its creation in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks..."

Invokes the memory of the September 11th attacks to create a foundational sense of fear and threat, reminding readers of a traumatic national event that necessitated the agency's creation, thus justifying its ongoing mission.

fear engineering
"“As the threat landscape continues to evolve, DHS is there. By air, land, sea, or in cyberspace, the DHS workforce boldly confronts the threats our nation faces every day,” Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement marking the anniversary."

Uses language like 'threat landscape continues to evolve' and 'threats our nation faces every day' to instill a lingering sense of generalized fear, framing DHS as the vital protector against these constant dangers.

urgency
"With conflict recently erupting in Iran, Noem also emphasized vigilance at home, writing on X that she is “in direct coordination with our federal intelligence and law enforcement partners as we continue to closely monitor and thwart any potential threats to the homeland.”"

Connects current geopolitical events (Iran conflict) to domestic security, creating a sense of immediate danger and urgency, prompting concern for 'potential threats to the homeland.'

fear engineering
"Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the department says, arrested 1,538 known or suspected terrorists and removed 1,534, along with thousands of gang members tied to groups such as Tren de Aragua and MS-13."

Highlights the removal of 'known or suspected terrorists' and 'thousands of gang members' associated with violent groups like MS-13, directly appealing to fears about national security and community safety.

fear engineering
"The U.S. Coast Guard intercepted over 547,000 pounds of illegal narcotics — nearly three times its normal annual average — which officials say prevented hundreds of millions of lethal doses from reaching American communities."

Uses the vivid image of 'hundreds of millions of lethal doses' of drugs being prevented from reaching 'American communities' to evoke a strong sense of fear and relief, emphasizing the life-saving impact of DHS actions.

Narrative Analysis (PCP)

How the article reshapes thinking: Perception (what beliefs are targeted), Context (what information is shifted or omitted), and Permission (what behavior is being encouraged).

What it wants you to believe

The article aims to instill the belief that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), particularly under the current administration, is an indispensable and highly effective organization diligently protecting the nation from a multitude of threats. It wants the reader to believe that DHS is crucial for national security, border control, and disaster response, and that its current leadership is achieving significant successes despite political and financial challenges.

Context being shifted

The article shifts the context of the DHS's 23rd anniversary from a general historical reflection to an endorsement of the agency's current leadership and policies. It frames the anniversary as an opportunity to highlight specific enforcement actions and statistical achievements under the Trump/Noem administration, making these actions appear as the natural and successful fulfillment of the DHS's founding mission. The political conflict (shutdown, Democratic opposition) is framed as an external challenge that the effective DHS is bravely facing.

What it omits

The article largely omits context regarding the broader criticisms or controversies surrounding DHS operations, policies, and the metrics used to measure its success. For example, it highlights 'nine consecutive months of zero migrant releases' and 'total border apprehensions...lower than a single average month under the previous administration' without providing context on how these figures are calculated, potential humanitarian impacts, or the broader social and economic factors influencing migration. It also omits the debate around the efficacy and ethics of 'self-deportations' or the challenges associated with the identification and removal of 'known or suspected terrorists' beyond raw numbers. Similarly, it mentions the 'partial government shutdown' and 'Democratic opposition' as obstacles but does not delve into the reasons or specific policy disagreements behind this opposition, which would provide a more nuanced understanding of the 'politically charged moment.'

Desired behavior

The reader is nudged toward an elevated sense of approval, admiration, and trust in the Department of Homeland Security, particularly its current leadership. The desired behavior is to support the aggressive enforcement posture and policies of the current administration, view its actions as commendable and necessary, and potentially dismiss criticisms as mere 'political or budgetary headwinds' secondary to the agency's vital mission. It encourages a belief that the current approach is effectively 'keeping Americans safe.'

SMRP Pattern

Four manipulation maintenance tactics: Socializing the idea as normal, Minimizing concerns, Rationalizing with logic, and Projecting blame.

-
Socializing
-
Minimizing
-
Rationalizing
!
Projecting

"According to a statement from the department obtained by The Daily Wire, Border Patrol has recorded nine consecutive months of zero migrant releases at the southern border, ending what officials describe as the Biden administration’s “catch and release” policy."

Red Flags

High-severity indicators: silencing dissent, coordinated messaging, or weaponizing identity to shut down debate.

-
Silencing indicator
!
Controlled release (spokesperson test)

""As the threat landscape continues to evolve, DHS is there. By air, land, sea, or in cyberspace, the DHS workforce boldly confronts the threats our nation faces every day,” Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement marking the anniversary. “We are working diligently to prevent cybersecurity and terror threats, safeguard the southern border, reform our broken immigration system, and help Americans in the face of natural disasters. Our mission could not be achieved without your extraordinary courage and commitment. I am especially grateful to those of you who are serving during the current shutdown without a paycheck.""

-
Identity weaponization

Techniques Found(5)

Specific propaganda techniques identified using the SemEval-2023 academic taxonomy of 23 techniques across 6 categories.

Appeal to ValuesJustification
"More than two decades after its creation in response to the deadliest terrorist attack on American soil, DHS is marking its anniversary while confronting both evolving global threats and immediate fiscal constraints. Department leadership maintains that the mission remains unchanged: protect the homeland and keep Americans safe, regardless of political or budgetary headwinds."

This quote appeals to shared American values of national security and safety by reminding readers of the 9/11 attacks, the agency's origins, and its mission to 'protect the homeland and keep Americans safe,' thus justifying its existence and actions despite current controversies.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"According to a statement from the department obtained by The Daily Wire, Border Patrol has recorded nine consecutive months of zero migrant releases at the southern border, ending what officials describe as the Biden administration’s “catch and release” policy."

The phrase 'catch and release' is highly pejorative and used to frame the previous administration's immigration policy negatively, suggesting leniency or a lack of enforcement without neutral description.

Loaded LanguageManipulative Wording
"Over the last 13 months, nearly 3 million illegal aliens have left the United States amid the administration’s immigration crackdown, including an estimated 2.2 million self-deportations and more than 713,000 deportations, according to DHS."

The term 'illegal aliens' is an emotionally charged and legally specific term often used in political discourse to de-humanize undocumented immigrants and emphasize their unlawful status, contrasting with more neutral terms like 'undocumented immigrants' or 'migrants'.

Exaggeration/MinimisationManipulative Wording
"DHS also highlights joint efforts with the Department of Health and Human Services to locate 145,000 unaccompanied minors it says were lost under prior border policies, as well as reforms to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) aimed at accelerating state-led disaster response."

The phrase 'lost under prior border policies' is an exaggeration that implies negligence or deliberate misplacement of 145,000 children, potentially without sufficient direct evidence that all were literally 'lost' due to policy, rather than, for example, being released to sponsors whose contact was subsequently 'lost' due to inadequate tracking.

Name Calling/LabelingAttack on Reputation
"That aggressive enforcement posture has fueled Democratic opposition and contributed to the funding standoff now affecting the department."

Labeling the 'Democratic opposition' as the primary cause of the 'funding standoff' frames them as obstructionist, attributing negative motivations to their actions rather than discussing policy disagreements.

Share this analysis